Log in
Search
Latest topics
Most active topic starters
Malamaram chakkappan | ||||
pareekutty | ||||
raman | ||||
icsure | ||||
saimesh | ||||
Admin | ||||
vivaradoshi | ||||
anilpnair | ||||
VHSE Terminator | ||||
satheesh |
Top posters
Malamaram chakkappan (595) | ||||
raman (428) | ||||
pareekutty (267) | ||||
safeerm (97) | ||||
vivaradoshi (82) | ||||
satheesh (78) | ||||
icsure (74) | ||||
dilna (68) | ||||
ganeshh (65) | ||||
Nissangan (62) |
Like/Tweet/+1
Statistics
We have 1385 registered usersThe newest registered user is ihsy
Our users have posted a total of 2388 messages in 1262 subjects
UGC NET Supplementary Result is violation of Article 14?
v4vhse :: Career Corner :: Open Stage
Page 1 of 1
UGC NET Supplementary Result is violation of Article 14?
UGC announced a supplementary result and made passed about 15000 students as they involved in the top 7% of the concerned subject.It is not an anomaly or violation of any article as referred by some people. In the nagpur order page no 24 says UGC lawyer argued that petitioners should not argue against the supplementary result without making a candidate who benefited from it as a party in the case. As a reply to this petitioners advocate said, they are not saying it was a wrong but just want to extend such a result (supplementary) also for petitioners.
Then people say those who got 64.57 has been declared passed while those who got the near minimum (about 42% or less aggregate) has declared passed and this is an anomaly. But in the prevailing situation, as NET is conducting as a recruitment test by UGC,(though it is illegal for an eligibility test) and that is why this happens. UGC has selected top 7% of the total appeared for exam subject to the paper minimum and so cut off comes. So the candidate who got 64.57% cannot be said better than who got 40% because the candidate who got 64.57% comes in the 93% lower group due to the easy question in his subject or comparatively brilliant top 7% in his subject. The candidate who got nearly minimum is good because, he has got more marks than 93% of candidates scored in his subject inspite of the difficulty level of the question. The whole can be exemplified as follows
Suppose following is the result of two subjects arranged in descending order of marksCategory is general
Commerce Computer science
No Name Agg% No Name Agg%
1. Anu 80% 1 Ram 70%
2. Mithun 74% 2 Varsha 65%
3. Meg 72% 3. jain 62%
4. Akhil 70% 4. Shiva 57%
5. Shyam 68% 5 Rahu 52%
6. Binu 66% 6. Sneha 50%
7. Raj 65% 7. Ravi 46%
8. Sudheer 64% 8. ramesh 42%
9 ---------- ------- 9 ----- --------- ---------------- ------------
--- -------------- ----------- ----------------- ----------------
100. Sathees 20% 100. Rohith 10%
Suppose 100 candidates wrote exam in both subjects and when selecting the top 7% , in the commerce the candidate up to Raj who got 65% will be passed and so cut off will be 65%. All others who got even 64.57% includes in the failed 93% remaining candidates and in computer science the top 7% ends in ravi who got 46% aggregate. Ravi is brilliant in comparing with students of his subject as it is difficult. Only 6 persons are scored more than him and all other 93% is below him. How this become anomaly of violation of Article 14?
If it is violation then NET should only be conducted only once. Because the difficulty level of question differs and so the cut off of June 2012 and december 2012 were differ. The cut off for commerce in for general in december 2012 was 60%. But in June I think it was 64.57% for general. If you say supplementary result was violation then this also could be said violation and no question maker could make an equally easy/difficulty level question at all and the all over performance of students may also differ.
One more thing- You may say NET is an eligibility test and recruitment rules are not bind to it. It is right and there no need of top 7% of all or top 15% of the minimum acquired. But Noone has challenged the June 2013 notification which contains top 15% rule. If you are a June victim and has applied for June 2013 you internally agree that NET is a selection/recruitment test
I am not supporter of UGC. But facts are facts. There is no need of baseless criticism
anandkrishna- Posts : 3
Reputation : 0
Join date : 2013-08-22
v4vhse :: Career Corner :: Open Stage
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Mon Jun 28, 2021 3:49 pm by vimalesh
» വിദൂര വിദ്യാഭ്യാസക്കാരുടെ വിവരശേഖരണം
Sun Dec 08, 2019 3:53 pm by vivaradoshi
» വി എച്ച് എസ് ഇ പൊതു പരീക്ഷാ മൂല്യനിര്ണയം ചെയ്യുന്നത് യോഗ്യത ഇല്ലാത്തവര്
Sun Apr 01, 2018 1:27 pm by sasikumar
» വി എച്ച് എസ് സി പേപ്പർ വാല്യുവേഷൻ ക്യാമ്പിൽ നടക്കുന്നത് കൊള്ളയോ?
Sun Apr 01, 2018 11:52 am by sasikumar
» Original RTI replies collected from 72 Govt VHS Proving distance degree candidates are appointed by PSC
Sun Apr 01, 2018 11:49 am by sasikumar
» Hi
Sun Apr 01, 2018 11:45 am by sasikumar
» 10+2 equivalentt certificate
Thu Mar 22, 2018 9:42 pm by Admin
» Designation wise list distance and private degree teachers working in vhse
Mon Feb 12, 2018 3:19 pm by Admin
» VHSE Transfer 2017- Lists
Tue Oct 03, 2017 3:02 pm by Malamaram chakkappan
» VHSE Special Rules in Clear formats
Tue Sep 19, 2017 9:31 pm by Malamaram chakkappan