Home
vhse
Gallery
Publications
Search
Register
Log in
Contact UsLog in
Search
Latest topics
Most active topic starters
| Malamaram chakkappan |
| |||
| pareekutty |
| |||
| raman |
| |||
| icsure |
| |||
| saimesh |
| |||
| Admin |
| |||
| vivaradoshi |
| |||
| anilpnair |
| |||
| VHSE Terminator |
| |||
| satheesh |
|
Top posters
| Malamaram chakkappan (595) |
| |||
| raman (428) |
| |||
| pareekutty (267) |
| |||
| safeerm (97) |
| |||
| vivaradoshi (82) |
| |||
| satheesh (78) |
| |||
| icsure (74) |
| |||
| dilna (68) |
| |||
| ganeshh (65) |
| |||
| Nissangan (62) |
|
Like/Tweet/+1
Statistics
We have 1385 registered usersThe newest registered user is ihsy
Our users have posted a total of 2388 messages in 1262 subjects
Affiliates
Sudarsanan L vs State Of Kerala
Page 1 of 1
Sudarsanan L vs State Of Kerala
by raman Sun Oct 14, 2012 7:25 pm
Sudarsanan L vs State Of Kerala
The petitioners are ministerial staff of the Vocational Higher Secondary Education Department. They aspire for promotion to the post of Non-Vocational teacher in the 10% quota reserved for qualified ministerial staff, out of the total posts of Non-Vocational teachers in each category in the department. At a time, when Special Rules had not been framed, they were provisionally appointed as Non- Vocational teachers. At that time, the qualifications for appointment to the post of Non-Vocational teachers in Vocational Higher Secondary Education Department were governed by Government Order on the subject. The petitioners possessed the qualifications so prescribed by Ext.P3 Government Order. Recognizing that qualification, the petitioners were appointed as Non-Vocational teachers (formerly known as non-vocational ecturers) in English under Rule 9(a)(i) of Part II of Kerala State & Subordinate Services Rules, pending finalization of the Special Rules, subject to the condition that such appointments shall be limited to 10% of the cadre strength of each category and that such appointment will not confer on them any preferential claim in the service later. Accordingly, the petitioners continued as non- vocational teachers provisionally. Subsequently, in 2004, Special Rules were framed. The petitioners do not possess the qualifications prescribed by the Special Rules. Therefore, they are sought to be reverted as Ministerial staff. It is under the above circumstances, the petitioners have approached this court challenging the rules prescribing qualifications and also seeking a direction to the respondents for regularization of petitioners in service as Non-Vocational teachers.
For details [You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]
raman- Legend of VHSE
-
Posts : 428
Reputation : 9
Join date : 2012-08-21
Location : Kozhikode
Extended Profile
Your views:
Nick name: Star
Experience:
(1/1)
Similar topics» K.Rajalakshmi vs The State Of Kerala And Others on 23 December, 2010
» Sreekumar.M vs State Of Kerala
» Shai Mol.J.S., Jayanthi Nivas vs State Of Kerala
» Sreekumar.M vs State Of Kerala
» Shai Mol.J.S., Jayanthi Nivas vs State Of Kerala
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
» വിദൂര വിദ്യാഭ്യാസക്കാരുടെ വിവരശേഖരണം
» വി എച്ച് എസ് ഇ പൊതു പരീക്ഷാ മൂല്യനിര്ണയം ചെയ്യുന്നത് യോഗ്യത ഇല്ലാത്തവര്
» വി എച്ച് എസ് സി പേപ്പർ വാല്യുവേഷൻ ക്യാമ്പിൽ നടക്കുന്നത് കൊള്ളയോ?
» Original RTI replies collected from 72 Govt VHS Proving distance degree candidates are appointed by PSC
» Hi
» 10+2 equivalentt certificate
» Designation wise list distance and private degree teachers working in vhse
» VHSE Transfer 2017- Lists
» VHSE Special Rules in Clear formats