UGC NET Why aggregate is wrong?

What is wrong with aggregate 65% criteria
RA means right answers, PI P2 and P3 are Paper 1.2 and 3 See notes and analysis in sheet 2 of this work sheet
PI right answers	PI Marks	PI %	P2 Ri.Ans	P2 Marks	P2 %	PI+P2 RA	PI+P2 Marks	PI+P2%	P3 RA	P3 Marks	P3%	Total RA	Total Marks	Aggregate %
50	100	100	50	100	100	100	200	100	75	150	100	175	350	100
20	40	40	20	40	40	40	80	40	38	76	50.67	78	156	44.57
20	40	40	20	40	40	40	80	40	74	148	98.67	114	228	65.14
20	40	20	20	40	40	40	80	40	75	150	100	115	230	65.71
32	64	64	33	66	66	65	130	65	49	98	65.33	114	228	65.14

20

40

40

20

40

40

40

80

40

73

146

97.33

113

226

64.57

20

40

40

37

74

74

57

114

57

56

112

74.67

113

226

64.57

20

40

40

20

40

40

40

80

40

73

146

97.33

113

226

64.57

50

100

100

26

52

52

76

152

76

38

76

50.67

114

228

65.14

Highlights and Findings
1) 44.57% is the effective minimum aggregate % referred in original notification for general candidates and there is more than 20% increase in the criteria published after result. Such a high increase is not justifiable on any ground (refer row number 5,6,7 and 8 of sheet1
2) For the earlier descriptive version UGC considered Paper1 and 2 are qualifying to evaluate the 3rd paaper. When this concept is followed here a candidate scored minimum in those two papers have to score almost 100% in 3rd paper to get the 65% aggregate ( Refer row 43,44 and 45 )
3) When taking an average it requires 32 correct answers out of 50 for paper1 and 33 out of 50 in paper 2 and 49 out of 75 in paper 3 to acquire 65% (refer row
4) A candidate who scored 74% both in subject papers ie.Paper 2 and 3 will be failed (refer row 602)
5) A candidate who may score 97.33% in third paper can be in failed list while mere 50% in 3rd could be passed (refer row 1096 and 1188 ) and still more nonsense you can when this is analysed more

[You must be registered and logged in to see this link.]

u