Why do UGC Restrict the No. of Passed

In related with the context of ugc's injustice towards the candidates who has attended the exam and waited for a good result in June 2012, where ugc implemented a complete objective type exam, it will be interesting to look at the financial reasons behind the decision which ugc increased the criteria as aggregate 65%. Even though the argument of UGC was they done it to keep the quality in teaching. It is actually a good joke if this millennium as there no need of NET exam itself. It was recommended by Mehrothra Committee to standardise the quality of lecturing as there was a grate difference in the conditions, system and evaluation of university education. For some universities getting 70% marks by a student in PG was highest for some others it is lowest and so the necessity of NET. The scene has changed a lot in globalised environment of Education and so to standardise mere NET exam will not do good results

For june 2012 UGC increased the criteria to restrict the number of candidates passing NET. Their justification for such a bad act is related with quality. But many of the thinkers indicate there is a financial reason behind it. The NET candidates are 'ducks which lay golden egg' and so it is not desirable to UGC to kill them. The following cost analysis will prove it